Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB NVMe M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSD Review

Mobile devices like ultrabooks, tablets, and handheld gaming consoles are getting more popular each year. Even if we look only at handheld consoles, a year ago, we had one popular option: Steam Deck. There is also ASUS ROG Ally and Lenovo Legion GO, and soon MSI will join with their new product. Most consoles and other devices are sold with lower capacity or simply slower storage, so it’s not a surprise that many owners think about replacing the storage, which more often is M.2 SSD in a user-friendly and tiny 2230 form factor. Corsair designed the reviewed today MP600 Core Mini for those users at a high 2TB capacity.

As usual in our reviews, we start with the specifications and features, and later, we will focus on the performance of the MP600 Core Mini SSD.

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – Features; Source: Corsair

Specifications and Features

MP600 CORE MINI
PCIe 4.0 (Gen4) x4 NVMe M.2 SSD

HIGH-CAPACITY STORAGE IN A TINY PACKAGE

The CORSAIR MP600 CORE MINI offers strong storage performance in a tiny package ideal for handheld gaming PCs and tablets, achieving rapid read and write speeds.

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – Features; Source: Corsair

Key Features

  • ULTRA COMPACT FORM FACTOR
    Add speedy high-capacity SSD storage to your handheld gaming PC and small form-factor devices
  • HIGH-SPEED PCIe GEN4 x4 NVMe 1.4 M.2 INTERFACE
    The MP600 MINI provides impressive storage space and performance for PCIe Gen4-compatible systems
  • WIDE COMPATIBILITY
    Easily upgrade your handheld gaming device, tablet, or other thin and light devices
  • HIGH-DENSITY 3D QLC NAND TECHNOLOGY
    Provides the ideal mix of capacity, performance, and value.
  • WORLD-CLASS SUPPORT
    Our award-winning service means you can enjoy your gear worry-free.
Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – Features; Source: Corsair

 

Specifications

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB Specifications
Form Factor
M.2 2230
HeatsinkNo
Interface
PCIe Gen 4.0 x4
SSD Max Sequential Read CDMSSD
SSD Max Sequential Write CDMUp to 3800MB/s
Max Random Read QD32 IOMeterUp to 550K
Max Random Write QD32 IOMeterUp to 900K
Storage Temperature
-40°C to + 85°C
Operating Temperature
0°C to +65°C
Endurance450 TBW
MTBF Hours
1,500,000 Hours
Storage Humidity
93% RH (40°C)
Power Consumption Active
4.1W Average
NAND Technology
3D QLC – Micron 176-layer NAND
Controller
Phison PS5021-E21-48
DRAM Cache Size
No
Encryption
AES 256-bit

Full specifications and features with additional info can be found on the Corsair product website.

 

The MP600 Core Mini is designed to work up to 5GB/s. Not all mobile devices will reach such bandwidth. For example, the most popular Steam Deck is limited to PCIe 3.0 x4 bandwidth, so in most cases, it’s around 3.5GB/s. This is one of the reasons why our tests are performed on a desktop motherboard, which doesn’t limit the tested SSD.

The SSD is based on a Micron QLC NAND, as most new M.2 2230 SSDs. QLC NAND is cheaper and isn’t much slower than TLC, as long as we won’t exceed SLC cache capacity during write operations. The 2TB version of the MP600 Core Mini will show a significant write bandwidth drop after about 500GB of continuous write. Most competitive M.2 2230 SSDs have smaller caches, so that’s the first advantage of the Corsair MP600 Core Mini.

The endurance could be better, too, as the 2TB MP600 Core Mini is rated at 450TBW. On the other hand, this SSD is designed for devices that, for most of the time, perform reading operations, and writes are not so often.

Below is a list of additional specifications taken from AIDA64.

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – AIDA64 Specifications

Some readers may notice that the tested SSD has an operating temperature of up to 65°C. This means we can expect thermal throttling above this point. Most SSDs have it at 70-75°C. We haven’t seen visible throttling up to at least 70°C. Even though insignificant, the performance drop was visible at 73°C, the maximum temperature during tests.

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – Temperatures

 

Typical temperature during mixed-load tests or gaming is below 70°C. After extended PCMark 10 tests, the maximum registered temperature by hwinfo64 was 68°C, as seen in the screenshot below.

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – hwinfo64 – mixed-load temperatures

 

 

Packaging and Product Photos

The MP600 Core Mini SSD arrived in a retail package, which is a small, flat box. We will find a tiny SSD in a blister box and additional info cards from Corsair.
Everything we may need to know on the exterior of the package, including general specifications, contact to support, and main product features.

The SSD itself is tiny. All the ICs are on the front side of the PCB and include almost only 176-layer QLC Micron NAND and Phison PS5021-E21-48 controller. It’s a low-power but still quite a high-performance combo.

 

Comparison Tests

Test Setup
ProcessorRyzen 7 7800X3D
MotherboardGigabyte B650E Master
Graphics CardColorful RTX4080 Advanced OC 16GB
Memory KitCorsair Dominator Titanium 48GB DDR5-7200 CL36-46-46 1.40V
Power SupplyCorsair HX1200, 1200W 80+ Platinum
OS StorageKingston Fury Renegade 2TB M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSD
Test StorageAcer Predator GM7000 4TB PCIe 4.0 SSD
ADATA Legend 970 2TB PCIe 5.0 SSD
ADATA XPG GAMMIX S70 Blade 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD
Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD
Corsair MP700 Pro 2TB PCIe 5.0 SSD
Crucial P5 Plus 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD
Crucial T500 Pro 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD
Crucial T700 Pro 2TB PCIe 5.0 SSD
Kingston FURY Renegade 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD
KLEVV CRAS 930 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD
Patriot VP4300 Lite 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD
TEAMGROUP CARDEA A440 1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD
TEAMGROUP MP44 1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD
Operating SystemWindows 11 Pro x64 with the latest updates

 

 

Tests were performed on popular synthetic benchmarks and benchmarks that simulate daily workloads. Most tests are free, so you can compare some results at home without spending money.

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – CrystalDiskInfo

The SSD was delivered in perfect condition, with 0GB total writes, as you can see in the screenshot from CrystalDiskInfo. This is where we start our performance tests.

 

Benchmarks list includes:

  • AIDA64 Storage Benchmark: Random Read and Write
  • ATTO Disk Benchmark
  • CrystalDiskMark: Sequential Read and Write, Random Low Queue Read and Write, IOPS
  • PCMark 10 Storage Benchmarks:  Data, Quick, and Full System Tests
  • 3DMark Storage Benchmark

 

ATTO Disk Benchmark

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – ATTO Disk Benchmark – Sequential Tests

ATTO used to be the most popular benchmark to test storage performance. However, it focuses on sequential bandwidth, which, in recent years, hasn’t been as crucial as random operations. It still counts and is the main factor describing the storage performance by the marketing of all brands.

The MP600 Core Mini has a maximum rated sequential read bandwidth of 5GB/s and a write bandwidth of 3.8GB/s. Seeing 6.91GB/s read and 5.30GB/s write in our tests was a real surprise. It’s the only test showing such a high sequential bandwidth, but there are unexpected results in other benchmarks. The test was rerun several times, and the results were similar each time.

 

CrystalDiskMark

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – CrystalDiskMark – Sequential Bandwidth

Nowadays, CrystalDiskMark is the leading benchmark for home and office storage devices. It’s free, easy to use, and provides many valuable results.

Our results in sequential tests are close to those declared by Corsair—higher read bandwidth but slightly lower write.

 

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – CrystalDiskMark – Random Bandwidth 4K Q1T1

Low queue random operations are essential for daily usage. The read bandwidth is significant for gaming.

The MP600 Core Mini isn’t expected to beat the M.2 2280 SSD with faster controllers, but its results are still pretty good. In writing, they’re even the best in comparison. Since it uses HMB and PC RAM, it could improve results in this specific test.

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – CrystalDiskMark – Random 4K IOPS

IOPS results are more important for professional work and content creation.

The MP600 Core Mini shows much higher IOPS in reading operations – 700k vs specified 550k, but almost as high results as specified in writes. Both results are pretty high for any M.2 SSD.

 

PCMark 10 Storage Benchmarks

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – PCMark 10 Storage Benchmarks

The MP600 Core Mini performs exceptionally well in PCMark 10 Storage benchmarks. It beats a higher series of M.2 2280 SSD in most tests. We wouldn’t expect that from 2230 SSD, also based on QLC NAND.

 

3DMark Storage Benchmark

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – 3DMark Storage Benchmark

3DMark Storage Benchmark shows the difference between MP600 series SSD and top series M.2 SSDs on the market. I wish we had more M.2 2230 SSDs for this comparison, but I can add that Team Group MP44s or other QLC 2230 SSDs perform about the same or slightly worse. The only faster SSD is Corsair MP600 Mini (not Core Mini). As one of the few SSDs in this form factor, it uses TLC NAND.

 

AIDA64 Disk Benchmark

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD – AIDA64 Disk Benchmark

Ultimately, the AIDA64 Disk Benchmark is in random read and write operations. This benchmark isn’t popular but gives us one specific workload – extended random operations. It’s also great to test whether or not the SSD throttles during extended workloads.

The MP600 Core Mini doesn’t throttle in the AIDA64 benchmark, and the average bandwidth is excellent. It beats most other SSDs in our comparison. Once again, it surprised us with higher-than-expected results. It’s hard to explain why, in this benchmark, the MP600 Core Mini is better than the top PCIe 5.0 SSD. As in other tests, we had to rerun AIDA64 storage tests several times to ensure the behavior was repeatable.

Even though the MP600 Core Mini isn’t the fastest, some results are exceptional, even for high-series M.2 SSDs. This SSD is great for portable devices as it’s small and quick. We don’t have many M.2 2230 SSDs for direct comparison, but the competition has nothing faster for handheld gaming consoles. Especially in the most popular Steam Deck, the new competitive M.2 2230 SSDs are as fast as the MP600 Core Mini or are limited by the console itself. Only some M.2 2230 SSD series are available at 2TB capacity, which makes the MP600 Core Mini a very interesting upgrade option.

Corsair MP600 Core Mini 2TB PCIe 4.0 SSD

 

Conclusion

Even though the MP600 Core Mini feels like a downgrade from the previously released MP600 Mini, in reality, it has a higher maximum capacity and is supposed to be cheaper. At the same time, it’s designed for devices with problems utilizing PCIe 4.0 x4 bandwidth, so it wouldn’t make a difference if the SSD is slightly faster or slower. The MP600 Core Mini delivers optimal performance for mobile devices, and our tests confirm it performs even better than expected.

Corsair offers the 2TB version of the MP600 Core Mini for around $190 in its online store. It’s not cheap, but all M.2 2230 SSDs are very expensive, so if we need one for our daily challenges, we don’t have a choice. If we search it in other stores, we can save up to $30. It’s one of the least expensive 2TB M.2 2230 SSDs at this price.

If we gather up all the pros and cons, then the MP600 Core Mini is still an exciting option for gamers on the go. It’s not cheap, but the price is reasonable. It’s not the fastest, but we won’t find anything better at 2TB capacity at the given price. It’s widely available, while other brands need help delivering their products. Once we add everything, it’s clear that Corsair is a recommended upgrade for our mobile device or handheld console.
MP600 Core Mini is another well-designed Corsair product, which is hard not to recommend, so we also put our Approved stamp!

 

Click the stamp for an explanation of what this means.

 

 

Bartosz Waluk – Woomack

 

Related Articles:

 

Loading new replies...

Avatar of Blaylock
Blaylock

"That Backfired" Senior Member

8,019 messages 900 likes

Nice review Woomack.

Looks like a great option for anyone needing High Capacity, High Speed, and Small Footprint.

Reply 2 Likes

W
Woomack

Benching Team Leader

13,227 messages 2,263 likes

Even though TLC NAND would be better, in reality, it affects mainly the TBW factor. For those small QLC SSDs, it's quite low. On the other hand, they're designed for mobile devices, which are not writing a lot, so they should still last a couple of years.
I had to skip tests on Steam Deck as every M.2 2230 SSD is limited and it would give misleading results. However, I can confirm that at least on Steam Deck, it doesn't really matter if SSD is TLC or QLC. In a direct comparison between MP600 Mini (TLC) and MP600 Core Mini (QLC), it's hard to say which one is faster. The Core version is surprisingly fast in some tests, as you could see in the review. QLC SSDs are also available at 2TB capacity and soon probably 4TB too, while TLC are almost only up to 1TB.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of Blaylock
Blaylock

"That Backfired" Senior Member

8,019 messages 900 likes

I'm assuming it has an SLC Cache to aid in performance. Most TLC NAND drives do these days.

Reply Like

W
Woomack

Benching Team Leader

13,227 messages 2,263 likes

All SSDs have an SLC cache nowadays. However, depending on the drive, the size is different, and some show performance drops earlier. On QLC, performance drops are like 2GB/s+ to 100-300MB/s. On TLC, it's not so much. MP600 Core Mini has a large cache for QLC 2230 SSD. To see the performance drop, you have to write a lot of data. It's hard to see in daily usage.

Reply Like

f
freakdiablo
5,447 messages 788 likes

D'awww it's so cute. Whosagooddrive? WHOSAGOODDRIVE?

Honestly though this form factor is great for Ultrabooks and such. Had a little 12" X220 in college that I dropped a 64gb mSATA Mushkin SSD in. Having a second internal drive I can sync classwork to helped relieve some of the early SSD day jitters.

(Remember, the cloud is just someone else's computer :chair:)

Reply 2 Likes

Avatar of Nebulous
Nebulous

Dreadnought Class Senior

12,403 messages 970 likes

D'awww it's so cute. Whosagooddrive? WHOSAGOODDRIVE?

Snickers......:ROFLMAO:

Reply 1 Like

Avatar of Evilsizer
Evilsizer

Senior Forum Spammer

19,662 messages 220 likes

i saw how big it was and started thinking, they should do a raid 1+0 or is it 0+1 m.2 stick.

Reply 1 Like

W
Woomack

Benching Team Leader

13,227 messages 2,263 likes

i saw how big it was and started thinking, they should do a raid 1+0 or is it 0+1 m.2 stick.

Believe me, I was already thinking about the same thing :) However, a single 2280 SSD from the top series would be faster than 2230 in RAID. In most cases, single top 2280 series are faster in random operations than any RAID0/10 SSD. RAID helps mainly in sequential bandwidth and may boost IOPS on good hardware RAID controllers, but mainly in multitasking.
If SSDs were scaling better in RAID, then it would be a great idea to stack 8+ 2230. On desktop motherboards, DMI's max bandwidth will usually limit the max RAID bandwidth, even in sequential operations. I was already checking that on 5x 2280 SSD, and they're not scaling well. Usually, above 3 SSDs, random low queue 4K bandwidth is even getting worse.

Reply Like

click to expand...
Avatar of Evilsizer
Evilsizer

Senior Forum Spammer

19,662 messages 220 likes

i was thinking more the parity of it all but if they made it a 4tb with 4tb parity. longevity would be increased, we have maxed out bw every time a new PCIE revision comes out on performance m.2's. i still just use sata-III ssd's, for me i do not need the higher bw. i just can not fathom needing 1TB/ps bw needed for a gaming rig. things will always advance in pc hardware. i am not sure what kind of shift is going to have to happen to where using this extra speed is going to come into play out side of video editing or any kind of rendering. That would need not only a high end/workstation gpu but the high bw PCIE 3.0/PCIE4.0 provides to these M.2 drives. I was still using a 80gb seagate ATAIV drive when ocz released the vertex slc drives. now keep in mind i bought that 80gb drive when seagate launched that line. it went though so many upgrades i lost count, it was my OS drive. i still have it some where, i could/should do a drive health check on it. maybe i got extremely lucky with that driver that i never had any problems with it. i really can not tell you how many times i have reformatted that drive. i have always had a 2nd drive to keep my games and anything else i wanted to store. simply out of the fact that if the only drive i had, died, i lose every thing. i would have still ran that risk with the 2nd drive it still was a better chance of not losing it all. there was no way i was going to pay out the nose back then for scsi raid array or chance the cheap unstable ide raid cards.

Reply Like

click to expand...
W
Woomack

Benching Team Leader

13,227 messages 2,263 likes

I noticed that RAID 1 on a fast M.2 SSD is about as fast as on a single SSD. On budget or DRAM-less SSD, write bandwidth is lower in RAID 1. I see the point of RAID 1 if you have a PC that needs to work without breaks. It's still good to have backup.
In most cases, for a home/gaming PC, the best is to have a pretty average SSD or 2x in RAID 1 for OS and a separate single but fast SSD for games. Any SSD is still good for OS boot and once OS files are loaded to RAM, then other things work about as fast on lower and higher series SSDs. For gaming storage, the sequential bandwidth doesn't matter much (assuming it's still at least an average SSD), but a single SSD has faster access time and random low queue bandwidth than RAID. In short, it loads a lot of small files faster. It counts more in online games as in single player titles, it doesn't matter if you wait 1-2 seconds more or have little delay once in a while.

What I like since the last, maybe 2 years, are fast DRAM-less SSDs. It's mainly because they run at up to ~50°C, use low power, are cheaper, and are not much slower than the top SSD series. I say that based on PCIe 4.0 x4, as something like Acer Predator GM7 or Patriot VP4300 Lite has been working in my PCs for some months with pretty good results. Regular higher series M.2 SSDs are almost always overheating on ITX/sandwich-type mount motherboards. DRAM-less SSDs are not. The only new SSD with DRAM that runs at low temps is probably Crucial T500. It also performs some tasks like PCIe 5.0 SSDs (PCMark 10 storage tests were not much worse than on T700 SSD). This is also why I was thinking about 4x M.2 on the Minisforum mobo.

Reply Like

click to expand...