• Welcome to Overclockers Forums! Join us to reply in threads, receive reduced ads, and to customize your site experience!

FEATURED CatZilla Competition, CLOSED! Ended When 2012 Did

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.
I tried to run it, and it craps out. :( I will have to look for an update..

*EDIT

downloaded the updated beta:

catzilla.png


This benchmark is nice to watch! Unlike the 3dmark stuff..

Sidenote: only took 3 6970s to beat a single 680 /7970 :(

Almost time to upgrade! *sad*
 
Last edited:
Crap I realized I forgot to include cpu-z and gpu-z shots.. I will try again tomorrow. :) With tweaks.

Get the latest beta!
 
EarthDog said:
My Physics tests are neutered here.. with a 7970/3770k at 4GHz (mem 2666) Im hitting 1009 vs my results with the 3570k/680 hitting 965 with @ 4.5GHz). 3770K has a lot more left in the tank of course.. I just need to get off my *** and swap cards to run on 3770k/2666. Damn you holidays.. damn you!!! :p

EDIT: I also have a better HDD to swap to, minimal increase or not. I see Im getting pounded there.. What setup do you have on the storage?
Click to expand...

Point is that physics test base on GPU much more than CPU. Also I don't know if physx is not adding some points there.
7970 results are just sadly low even though in most tests ( except first ) you can make higher points then total score is lower.
Also point scalling on 7970 is worse than on GTX680. Check how scores are going up. There is lower difference each 100MHz comparing to GTX670/680.
I finished on 7970@1475MHz core and air cooled GTX680, not even higher clocked can beat this result without bigger problems.

Storage test base on cpu speed more than drives and it's not affecting final score much from what I see ( I can be wrong I just see how it's acting ).
 
bmwbaxter said:
Three 6970's
Click to expand...

Indeed is the rig in my signature. Yes sorry I forgot to post the gpu-z with it.. :( I will repost with all the proper programs running..

*EDIT

I re-ran the test, with the clocks a bit higher:
catzilla3.png


CPU was at 4.2 (forgot to reboot and turn off stepping).
 
Last edited:
Catzilla frontpage claims DX10 compatibility now! Someone with an older GPU should give it a shot and see what happens. It says GeForce 8xxx and AMD/ATI 2xxx and newer. Not sure if it means the full benchmark or not though.
 
Bobnova said:
Catzilla frontpage claims DX10 compatibility now! Someone with an older GPU should give it a shot and see what happens. It says GeForce 8xxx and AMD/ATI 2xxx and newer. Not sure if it means the full benchmark or not though.
Click to expand...

Its working with the GTX295.

Capture020402.jpg
 
I want to run the tiger version, but I only have kitty and cat options. :(

Edit: does work for DX10 though. Got like 2300 on cat with my 9800gtx.
 
Last edited:
Added everybody up to this point.
We're over 10 submissions, so there'll be a Random Draw prize too!

First and second are both AMD multi-card setups.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Johan45
FEATURED Marathon Season IV January: Catzilla 720p
6 7 8 9 10
Replies
191
Views
19K
Johan45
Johan45
EarthDog
FEATURED 3DMark TimeSpy released! Post up your scores!
6 7 8 9 10
Replies
183
Views
26K
Johan45
Johan45
bmwbaxter
Marathon: Heavenly June DX9
14 15 16 17 18
Replies
352
Views
18K
xsuperbgx
xsuperbgx
bmwbaxter
Marathon: March Madness 3D Mark(Firestrike)
9 10 11 12 13
Replies
241
Views
14K
bmwbaxter
bmwbaxter
bmwbaxter
Marathon: May Event- Aquamark!
15 16 17 18 19
Replies
369
Views
20K
Robert17
Robert17
Back