Cooler Master V6GT Review

Overclockers is supported by our readers. When you click a link to make a purchase, we may earn a commission. Learn More.

When the V6GT arrived at my doorstep, I was not sure what to expect. Thinking back to my first purchase of a high-end heat sink, the Cooler Master HHC-001, I guess I was expecting to be astounded and deafened. I did not go deaf and though not astounded I was satisfied with the performance. With a long list of award winning products and 10+ years of solid product history Cooler Master has developed the know how to get the job done and keep customers happy. The V6GT is not an exception to this winning record – with a push/pull fan setup, a well designed tower cooler at its heart, and great looks it can’t get much better.

Features and Specifications

Cooler Master’s V6GT Features and Specifications


  • Densely stacked asymmetrical tilted aluminum fins.
  • “Double-V” heatpipe array helps spread out the six heatpipes to fully utilize the cooling fins on the cooler. It also allows airflow to reach each individual heatpipe as opposed to traditional coolers.
  • Accelerating twin high-speed PWM fans with tool-free fan boxes.
  • Engine oil cap controls the LED strip with color changing function.
  • DynaLoop™ Bearing Fan: Self-lubricating bearing mechanism decreases oil-loss commonly seen on sleeve bearing fans. Evolutionary wave blade fan provides tremendous airflow with steady pressure.
  • Snap-on cover to conveniently add a second fan if needed.


CPU SocketIntel Socket LGA1366 / 1156 / 775 AMD Socket AM3 / AM2+ / AM2
Heat Sink Dimensions131 x 120 x 165 mm
Heat Sink MaterialCopper base / Aluminum fins / 6 heatpipes
Heat Sink Fin Thickness

0.6 mm
Fan Dimension120 x 120 x 25 mm
Fan Speed800- 2200 RPM (PWM)
Fan Airflow34.02 – 93.74 CFM (per fan)
Fan Air Pressure0.43 – 3.30 mmH2O (per fan)
Fan Life Expectancy40,000 hrs/25 °C
Bearing TypeDynaLoop™ Bearing
Connector4 Pins
Noise Level15 ~ 38 dBA
Rated Voltage12V DC
Start Voltage6V DC
Operating Voltage6 ~ 13.2V DC
Rated Current0.45A (0.7A Max. per fan)
Input Power5.4W (8.4W Max. per fan)
Warranty2 years

Packaging and Presentation

Packaging was very colorful and showed the product very well.

The enclosure (shroud) around the cooler looks nice but may also slightly impede performance – this will be covered later.

The light down the center top of the HSF is an excellent touch for fans of case lighting. The light is powered via a separate MOLEX connector.

The looks of this HSF are top notch, but I have to wonder how much the plating impedes the performance of any HSF, although this sort of plating is common.


There is one issue that can not be overlooked and must be addressed before all else: this cooler will not allow access to all memory slots in many mainstream motherboards. At worst you may not be able to install any memory. It is possible that there is some low profile memory out there that can be used, but then what would be the point of this cooler? The ASUS and Gigabyte examples below are both current mainstream boards. The ASUS is a LGA1156 P55 board and the Gigabyte is an AM3 890GX board. These boards are both very popular with overclockers on a budget so this large cooler may present problems.


Gigabyte 890GPA-UD3H
Gigabyte 890GPA-UD3H

Performance: Intel Core i5 661

The GT does a decent job of cooling an overclocked CPU, however the press release stated:

“The Xeon X5670 processors were overclocked to 4 GHz, yet the V6GTs kept both CPU’s at sub 70 °C, and the i5 655K was overclocked to a massive 5.269 GHz under 66 °C, even during extended periods of extreme benchmarking at these high clock speeds.”

This was tested at 4.45 GHz on an Intel Core i5 661 using an the ASUS P55 mainboard with room temperatures never exceeding 24 °C. The cooler performed fine, except in OCCT linpack. The voltage and settings could have been tweaked to lower the temps a bit, but after reading many reviews of this CPU and some testing myself, I just find the 5.269 GHz a little hard to swallow at normal room temps, though I could be wrong.

Core i5 661 on P55 Mainboard (1.4 V)
Core i5 661 on P55 Mainboard (1.4 V)

Core i5 661 @ 3.8 GHz on P55 Mainboard
Core i5 661 @ 3.8 GHz on P55 Mainboard

Performance: AMD Athlon II X4

There has been a lot said about the Athlon II X4 being a hot chip. The V6GT did a very good job of taming that heat up to 3.8 GHz at 1.6 V. The heatsink temperature was checked at each fin on each side at every slot. Placing thermocouples at various points helps identify possible manufacturing and design flaws.

One thermocouple was attached to a heat pipe near the base to act as a control, another thermocouple was used to measure air temperature and the datalogging dual head temperature meter is used to check the temperatures at all points. The T1 thermocouple is placed at the lowest point nearest the metered heat pipe and T2 thermocouple is used to probe the rest of the HSF.
What would show up as an extreme variance on the low side (typically 5-7 °C for example) would indicate poor material contact between the heat pipe and one or both of the fins touching the thermocouple. If all of the fins showed this large variance from the heat pipe, then there is the possibility of a major manufacturing defect: something is out of tolerance. However, I could find no obvious flaws with the sink itself.

Temperatures were great up to 3.8 GHz; with an idle temp of 21 °C on the cores and a torture temp of 42 °C this HSF competes well with all but the most extreme HSFs. The maximum variance during a torture and stability test using OCCT linpack and WCG BOINC was 3 °C showing the effectiveness of the contact between the base, pipes and cooling fins as well as heat pipe efficiency.

Comparative Testing

Setting up a small comparison test with a Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme and ThermalTake 78 CFM fan was probably the highlight of the testing.
Using a pan and riser made for testing heat sinks on a conventional heat source (described in more detail here: Testing) many observations can be made and conclusions reached.

When everything is hooked hooked up and ready to go the heating process begins.

When a humidity level of 90-100% is reached and the temperature reaches 70 °C +2-0 everything is started up and the monitoring begins.

The shots above show the cooling process and the one possible flaw with this cooler. Thermocouple 1 was measuring the temperature of the V6 while thermocouple 2 measured the temperatures of the Ultra 120. Because of the insulating factor of the shroud, the V6 started off at a 2 °C deficit, yet managed to close the gap and surpass the Ultra120 in 3 minutes. This can most likely be attributed to the push/pull design of the unit as well as a superior fan blade design .
Following the cooling process the gap is closed a bit, but even after 20 minutes the Ultra120 has not caught up.
What can be gathered from this test? A couple of things. The first and most important is a HSFs ability to dissipate a given amount of heat. This is directly related to one other important thing; how well the cooler can deal with rapid CPU temperature changes. This test also shows that the shroud may present a flaw. It works two-fold, at low RPMs it can work as an insulator of sorts and at high fan speeds it can cause turbulence, but how much? I didn’t investigate any further: it looks good and the cooler will still do the job.
The noise from the cooler was not covered here because it is often a very subjective topic. Depending on your usage pattern and your noise tolerance it could be considered too loud, but there again a vibrating case is much worse as the sound of this unit is not annoying, it is just there.

Closing Thoughts

A very good cooler that could have been great. I say that because of the memory issue.  What could have been done to make this product great?

  • The base and heat pipes could have been more in line with many of the top end HSFs and done without plating on the CPU contact portion of the base while also exposing a portion of the pipes.
  • The entire fin section of the unit could have been either raised or offset allowing for the installation of memory that is out today.
  • The light should have had a setting that allowed the colors to cycle, I did not find one.

Like everything manufactured today, compromises are made in design and/or performance to set a product apart from the competition. Though there are many users out there who simply prefer the “tower of power” or the aesthetic appeal of neon lights and case windows, they are not the largest segment of the market. Young users (not in age, but in experience and know how) – evolving enthusiasts, if you will – are the largest segment of the market. If you are into extreme air or blazing fast memory this product will probably not suit you. If you are new to the game and want to dabble with a little overclocking as well as get a nice upgrade then this cooler has your name on it.


Loading new replies...



3,842 messages 0 likes

Great Review Archer0915, well done and very informative, nice looking cooler too, Thanks :rock:

Reply Like



75,828 messages 2,656 likes

Excelent review Archer!!! Nice work!

Reply Like



5,050 messages 201 likes

Thanks, I try and look at things a little different.

Reply Like